His opening plan was criticized 'unethical'
The British government's re-opening plan was criticized by scientists as dangerous and unethical experiences, when CAVID-19 still increased rapidly.
We believe this plan is dangerous and stunted.
The letter, originally signed by 20 researchers, but now attracted 4,200 online signatures from scientists, doctors, nurses and other experts.
People wearing masks on London Street, England on June 6.
The government is embarking on dangerous and unethical experiments.
Dr. Deepti Gurdasani, epidemiologist at Queen Mary University in London, the initiator of the letter, accusing the government has chosen to have a batch infection, instead of protecting or vaccinating them.
This is unethical and unacceptable.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson earlier this month announced the restrictions will be removed.
Dr. Richard Horton, Lancet editor, said that contrary to the statement of government scientists, there was no scientific consent on the plan to re-open the door, instead of deep disagreement.
Many scientists are really concerned that with the number of people who are vaccinated with two noses below the optimal level and the speed of infection increases rapidly, we are at a very dangerous time in the pandemic.
Dr. Eric Topol, California Cardiologist, also signed a letter.
The British Medical Association also objected to the Government's re-opening plan, in the context of the country on April 7 recorded more than 32,000 new cases, the highest level since January.
According to the British government, 86.4% of people were injected at least one dose of Covid-19 and 64.6% vaccine that had two doses.
Comments
Post a Comment